Heads Will Roll

Categories

Health Freedom

By Marcus Sircus AC OMD

Who does the medical media work for? It's a simple question. Why does the medical media ignore all the controversies that exist around major medical issues and concentrate on reporting only on the official party lines of the CDC, FDA, AMA and the World Health Organization? These are questions that will lead to a kind of scandal the public media has never faced, one that will make the one that the BBC is presently facing seem small. The BBC is embroiled in challenges to its fairness and objectivity, essential responsibilities the press has to the public. Heads are rolling but this is nothing to what will happen if the truth ever gets out about the medical reporting departments at the BBC or the Times on both sides of the Atlantic. When it comes to medicine all newspapers, radio and television stations around the world report only what is 'approved' not what is fair or objective. Morris A. Bealle, a former city editor of the old Washington Times said,

"Even the most independent newspapers are dependent on their press associations for their national news and there is no reason for a news editor to suspect that a story coming over the wires of the Associated Press, the United Press or the International News Service is censored when it concerns health matters. Yet this is what happens constantly."

The medical-drug cartel was summed up by J.W Hodge, M.D., of Niagara Falls, N.Y., in these words:

"The medical monopoly or medical trust, euphemistically called the American Medical Association, is not merely the meanest monopoly ever organized, but the most arrogant, dangerous and despotic organization which ever managed a free people in this or any other age. Any and all methods of healing the sick by means of safe, simple and natural remedies are sure to be assailed and denounced by the leaders of the AMA as fakes, frauds and humbugs."

The AMA, which is interlocked with powerful medical groups like the FDA, the CDC and WHO, have somehow persuaded editors at all the major wire and news services to adopt policies which would not permit any medical news to clear that is not approved by these over lording organizations.

Medical assumptions are the bedrock of the medical establishment whether they are provable or not. So great is the lockstep in the press around medical issues like AIDS, cancer and vaccines one almost has to be a complete fool to challenge them.

The medical establishment and the medical media work together as intellectual reductionists who ignore and diminish the truth of doctors and scientists around the world who do not agree with the meal that gets published in the medical news each week. It does not take much intelligence to figure out that medical news censors are not going to approve any item that can in any way hurt the sale of drugs. It's a taboo that is rarely broken.

It is clear that the press feels the need to represent the basic beliefs of allopathic medicine without any care to the truth or falsity of what they are printing. When it comes to medicine we are dealing with people's lives so the medical media has a great responsibility. The public gives the media the same trust on medical issues that people give to their doctors, health officials and medical organizations. Many people depend on the medical press for information on which to make very important decisions.

If you cannot trust the medical press and your doctor to inform you of different opinions that exist on important medical issues whom can you trust? The answers to this are not going to come from your doctor or the medical news media. Trust is leaking out of the medical press and the overall medical community like oil leaking out from a damaged tanker. The leak would quickly turn into a massive brain hemorrhage if it were not for the mainstream medical press that keeps many fingers in the dike, holding off all challengers to mainstream medical assumptions.

Again we must ask the question why does the press buy totally into the allopathic party line? What do they get out of printing stories that are shaped by others? Senator John Edwards said recently,

"The interests of the great corporations and the wealthy, privileged classes are not the same as those of American working families. And because the power of government has shifted so radically in favor of the interests of the former, there is little left but indifference to the needs and aspirations of the latter, who just happen to be the vast majority of Americans."

This has never been truer than in the area of medicine where the great pharmaceutical and chemical companies have held open season on control and manipulation of doctors for over a century. And it does seem that these controlling interests have a throttle hold over the medical media for it is only what they want you to read that you will read.

The great problem for the media of course is that hundreds of thousands of people are dying at the hands of modern day allopathic medicine, that means everyday there are deaths going unreported. Malaria, a disease forgotten by the press, is advancing, killing a million people or more a year, at least 700,000 of them African children.

Yet the public is being scared by the medical media about bird flu, which has killed as many as a dozen people recently and of course we are going to hear repeatedly about how the race is on to develop a vaccine. Before that it was weeks of the media participating in the medical communities need to scare parents enough to stampede them into buying slow moving ineffective and dangerous flu shots, which are now being given away.

You will not hear in the press about the dangers of the new FluMist vaccine nor that some scientists have warned that repeated flu shots dramatically increase the chances of Alzheimer disease.

Before that it was SARS and publishing news about AIDS is very popular no matter how many doctors and scientists disagree with accepted AIDS theories. From fear to fear the medical community would have the public go. Perhaps they are trying to divert our attention from what we should really be afraid of. Or are they just trying to sell newspapers and increase advertising sales.

Ex newspaper man Morris A. Bealle sees something like a communist styled controlling censor system that gives the press little choice in the matter of what medical news can be published. Certainly you will not see a report about Dr Allen Roses, vice-president of GlaxoSmithKline, the giant pharmaceutical maker, who recently confessed that over 90 per cent of all drugs work for only between 30 and 50 per cent of patients.

Nor will you hear any calls for changes in the concentration camp type of conditions in which chickens are raised. Conditions that are possibly creating the dangers humanity might face with bird flu. Never will the press reach down to the causes of disease, what they print are medical solutions that do not address causes.

It does seem that most people in the medical press understand little to nothing about health and medicine and perhaps this is the problem. Lacking knowledge and deep understanding they gullibly print just about anything sent to them over the news wires.

It is no surprise to media watchers when the press publishes from the angle of an agenda, but in this case an agenda not even of their own. In the case of the medical news the fault does seem to lie with the authorities and senior editors more than with reporters.

But whatever is actually going on it stands to reason that the whole international lot of them should be put through some kind of mandatory educational process with inputs from various medical and health disciplines. In the end there are no excuses and the heads of the top brass should roll like they are in London this past week. If the truth comes out no doubt enough heads will fall that they will outdistance the reported deaths from the bird flu, SARS and the common flu combined.

In reflection if you think that the medical news is not being manipulated and masterminded by some organizations take a careful look at the words and phrases that are constantly being used. For instance watch the rather loose usage of the term "epidemic", which was used so much in connection with the SARS scare. The first reports of Bird Flu are also being referred to it as an epidemic. The report I first saw that called it an epidemic reported the death of two people. The words Bird Flu, epidemic, people dead, all in the same paragraph convey a powerful implication that the unwary will accept without much question. And everyone of course can now breathe a sigh of relief for surviving this year's flu epidemic.

Who cares after all about all the kids dying of malaria and the millions dying of hunger, unsanitary living conditions and undrinkable polluted water? Who cares that the medical profession is actually getting away with murder killing hundreds of thousands a year with 'properly' prescribed medicines? No one because the press will never report it that way!

Who cares that today and everyday all the children that are born will have a highly dangerous liquid injected into their blood streams, one that contains toxic chemicals that can create all kinds of health problems and even death. I personally know that Dr. Jane Orient cares, president of the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, she and many others have publicly come out against the Hepatitis B vaccine. But will you ever hear her voice published in the medical press?

Is it really possible that the international press agencies are actually participating in crimes against humanity? This is a dangerous question to ask and only the international courts at The Hague in Europe could eventually answer this. But if key medical organizations are eventually convicted of such crimes then surely the medical press will be hauled in as accomplices.

Dr. Matthias Rath and Dr. Aleksandra Niedzwiecki of the Dr. Rath Health Foundation have already brought such charges to the world court. It is a dangerous moment for the medical press and perhaps some brave journalistic souls will find the courage to start investigative reportages about these subjects and perhaps this can salvage the image the medical press will have in history. If Lord Hutton of England can initiate the rolling of so many heads at the BBC over a small issue imagine what he and others would do over serious issues that actually cost the lives of children and adults all over the world.

 

---

mandato da Robin Good il Saturday November 6 2004
aggiornato il Saturday September 23 2006

Print this article

TrackBack

URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/emma_holister/2004/11/06/heads_will_roll.htm

Related Articles

'It's About Individuals, Working Together' by Scott Tips
You know Margaret Mead's saying, "Never believe that a few caring people can't change the world. For indeed, that's all who ever have." But what you may not realize is how very true that has been in the health-freedom movement. A few people, working together, have made the difference between less and more freedom for us all.... [continua a leggere]
November 5, 2004 - Robin Good

'Poison for Profit' by Ashley Simmons Hotz
May 15, 2002 - The huge transnational companies that produce toxic chemicals found in pesticides, herbicides and industrial and household products profit not only from the sale of these products, but also from the symptoms and chronic illnesses that they can trigger. The vast majority of chemicals found in pesticides and other products, undergo little or no testing for chronic, low level exposures and for chronic health effects. The same... [continua a leggere]
October 11, 2004 - Robin Good

Huge Supplements Ban Coming to Europe: an Interview with John Hammell of IAHF
BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE COVER-UP An Interview with John Hammell of International Advocates For Health Freedom (IAHF) by Greg Ciola www.thehealthcrusader.com/pgs/article-0104-ban.shtml Crusador Newsletter DEC-JAN 2004, (ISSUE 16) In August 2005, everything in Europe is about to change. Over 300 bioavailable nutrient forms present in over 5,000 safe vitamin and mineral products that include a large number of the safest, most readily absorbed and most effective, food-derived forms will be... [continua a leggere]
September 15, 2004 - Robin Good

'The French Prohibition on Words Related to Healing' by Emma Holister
Where will the EU directive banning natural remedies and supplements lead us next? Look just across the border to France to get an idea... On reading the book "Healing, an Illegal Practice" by Sylvie Simon we not only discover the truth about the brutal repression of alternative medicine in France but that the very title of her book itself is causing a scandal. Those in Alternative Medicine in France are... [continua a leggere]
October 9, 2004 - Robin Good

	"Art does not reproduce the visible; rather, it makes visible." Paul Klee 1879-1940

Medical Disclaimer: The information on this site is not a substitute for medical advice.