Codex Alimentarius – A threat to your vitamin supplements?
Codex Alimentarius is an international standard-setting body dealing with how to safely process and store food products, avoiding hazards to our health. For about ten years, the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses has been mulling over a guideline for vitamin and mineral supplements, originally proposed by the German delegation to this committee, presumably to eliminate dangers from these additions of vital nutrients to our nutrition.
So far so good, but what dangers exactly are we talking about? When statistical evidence indicates that food supplements are by far the safest category of products in existence, why do we need regulations?
Could it be that pharmaceutical drugs, recently shown to be a leading cause of death in the Western world, are losing ground, that the pharmaceutical business is on its way out? If so, might it just be that the proponents of pharmaceutical drug "treatment" of disease could be leaning on legislators to eliminate what they perceive to be the cause of their woes - the natural way to health by proper nutrition?
How ever that may be, Paul Taylor has examined the question of Codex Alimentarius and the threat this international legislative body's deliberations may pose to our health by "regulating" supplements of vital nutrients in a most restrictive way.
Codex Alimentarius – A threat to your vitamin supplements?
Have you ever wondered what would happen if a group of legislators from 48 different countries got together to talk about nutrition and food? Probably not, as most of us have more important things to think about. Presumably though, they would sit down and discuss the importance of diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases, and then try to figure out ways to help us all to live longer, healthier lives. Right?
Wrong, unfortunately. Welcome to the world of the ‘Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses’, where the committee chairman talks about pharmaceutical drugs preventing diseases and the EU representative states that food and the prevention of diseases do not go together. If you’re the type of person who prefers processed food and who wouldn’t be seen dead in a health food shop, then you can relax and stop reading now, because Codex is definitely not a threat to your life style. But if you’re the sort who prefers natural healthcare to pharmaceutical drugs, and who supplements his or her diet with high doses of multi-vitamins and minerals then you could soon have a great deal to worry about, because Codex is a direct threat to your way of life.
So what is Codex?
The Codex Alimentarius Commission is the international body charged with setting global food standards, and is jointly sponsored by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Codex Alimentarius literally means "food code", and the Commission was set up in 1963 to protect the health of consumers, ensure fair practices in international food trade and to co-ordinate all international food standards work. (1). The legal basis for the enforcement of the guidelines and standards created by Codex dates back to the mid-1990s, when Codex Alimentarius signed agreements with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) by which Codex creates trade standards that the WTO uses to resolve international trade disputes. (2), (3), (4).
That all sounds fine, you are probably thinking. But how on earth could Codex possibly affect me when I want to buy vitamins, minerals and other nutrients?
Good question.
In fact, with the exception of co-ordinating international food standards work Codex doesn’t do any of the things that it was set up to do. The health of consumers is not being protected by the work of Codex, and the international trade in food is anything but fair. Nowhere is this more apparent than in what Codex is trying to do to the international availability of vitamins and minerals (which come under the definition of food at Codex), where it is attempting to pass a variation on the extraordinarily restrictive EU Food Supplements Directive (5) as the blueprint for the global regulation of food supplements.
The EU Food Supplements Directive, for those who are unaware of it, was passed by the EU Parliament in March 2002, and will be fully implemented on 1st August 2005. An extremely controversial piece of legislation, it will ban, on grounds of safety, almost 300 forms of vitamins and minerals from being sold within the EU - many of which have been sold for decades and are the same forms of nutrients that are found in food itself. So contentious, in fact, is this legislation that two cases challenging the legality of the ban have recently been referred to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg by the UK High Court.
Nevertheless, the EU is the single most important influence upon the Codex discussions, and Basil Mathioudakis, who was responsible for drafting the text of the EU Food Supplements Directive, is the head of the European Commission delegation at meetings of the ‘Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses’. Once the 10 new candidate countries join the EU in May 2004 Mr Mathioudakis will be representing a total of 25 EU Member States at Codex, and whenever he exercises his right to vote the 25 Member States will not be entitled to exercise theirs. (6). As such it is very likely that the EU will be able to wield a block vote at the next Codex meeting consisting of almost one half of all of the countries attending. (7).
Worse still, of the 48 countries who attended the previous meeting of the ‘Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses’ in November 2003 (8), only one of them, South Africa, is actively opposing these restrictive proposals for the world-wide availability of vitamins and mineral supplements. Democratically of course, since the EU, with its soon-to-be population of 450 million people (9), is allowed 25 votes at Codex, then large countries such as the United States, with its population of over 280 million people (10), should proportionately be given at least 15 votes. Under the Codex voting system however the United States is only allowed one vote, which means that the EU is now in an extremely powerful position.
As a result, the Codex vitamin and mineral restrictions could possibly be finalised this coming November in Bonn, Germany. If this happens the effect upon the aforementioned legal challenges to the EU Food Supplements Directive could be grave to say the least, because if the Codex restrictions were agreed before the legal challenge was completed the UK lawyers would in essence be arguing for the European Court of Justice to overturn legislation that was fully in line with a newly agreed global standard. Moreover, even if the legal challenges to the EU Food Supplements Directive are successful the Codex proposals could still be implemented as the global standard, thus effectively overruling any short-term victory for health freedom in the EU. As such, a finalised Codex text would have the ability to override the dietary supplement laws of all countries, including the United States.
Long-term, it would not be unreasonable to expect that other EU health-related legislation, such as restrictive regulations on nutrition and health claims, will become the blueprints for still further standards to be enacted by Codex on a globally harmonised basis. Ironic isn’t it, that far from being the protectors of our health, our governments and legislators now appear to be one of the biggest risks to it?
REFERENCES
(1) United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization
(2) SPS Agreement. World Trade Organization. URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENT: Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measure.
(3) TBT Agreement. World Trade Organization. URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENT: Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
(4) Understanding Codex Alimentarius. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. World Health Organization. 2000. pp. 24-25.
(5) EU Food Supplements Directive
(6) Codex Alimentarius Commission. Procedural Manual. Thirteenth Edition. Rules of Procedure of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Rule II (3) - Member Organizations. p. 6.
ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/Publications/ProcManuals/Manual_13e.pdf(7) Forty eight countries attended the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses 25th Session, held at the Bruckenforum, Bonn, Germany, from 3-7 November 2003. ALINORM04/26. See http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/report/34/al04_26e.pdf These forty eight countries included three of the new EU countries (Hungry, Poland and Slovenia). If the other seven new EU countries attend the next meeting in November 2004 (and assuming that every country that attended last year also attends) there will be fifty five countries attending in total. The EU will have twenty five votes.
(8) Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses. 25th Session. Bruckenforum, Bonn, Germany 3-7 November 2003. ALINORM04/26.
(9) Europe - statistics
(10) US - Census
If you wish to contact the Author:Paul Anthony Taylor
paulandpolly@btinternet.com
Tel: +44 (0)1325-466361
Cell: +44 (0)7903-738340
A more extensive version of this article with more details of a legal nature, is also available. The title of that article is "Codex Guidelines for Vitamins and Minerals - Optional or Mandatory?". It can be found on this site.
Related articles:
Pharmaceutical corporations accused of Genocide before ICC in The HagueMedical system is leading cause of death and injury in US
Codex - The Facts by James Gormley - Citizens for Health
The Growing Threats to DSHEA
A well documented article by Paul Taylor, discussing DSHEA, the US law on food supplements passed in 1994, and how this law may be influenced by the Codex Alimentarius guidelines on supplements...
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Monday March 22 2004
updated on Friday December 17 2010URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/03/22/codex_alimentarius_a_threat_to_your_vitamin_supplements.htm
Related ArticlesCodex: WHO/FAO Told Nutrient Risk Assessment Must Consider Benefits
In a submission to the FAO/WHO nutrient risk assessment project, Dr. Robert Verkerk, Director of the Alliance for Natural Health charges that assessment of the possible risks of nutrient overdose must also consider the beneficial effects of nutrients. He says that risk assessments undertaken to date "are not based on a sufficiently rational scientific platform" and "will provide misleading information for policy decision-makers". At stake is the continued availability of... [read more]
December 16, 2004 - Sepp HasslbergerCodex 2003 - Grossklaus and Mathioudakis: Nutrition not relevant to Health
November 3-7, 2003, the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for special dietary uses met in BONN, Germany, for their once-yearly come-together. On the agenda for discussion were, before baby foods and the description of healthy properties of food on labels, the proposed Codex Giudelines for "Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements". Such guidelines would be, once passed, the equivalent of international law to be followed in all commerce of vitamin... [read more]
November 25, 2003 - Sepp HasslbergerSouth Africa breaks ranks at Codex Nutrition Committee
The discussions around a proposed guideline for food supplements by the Committee for Nutrition and special dietary foods of the international standard setting body called Codex Alimentarius, have taken a most interesting turn this year. Population reference intakes (RDAs) were abandoned as a measure for determining upper level dosages of vitamins and minerals in supplements, substituted by scientific risk analysis as the method of choice for assuring protection of... [read more]
November 06, 2003 - Sepp HasslbergerCodex Nutrition Committee: Supplement Guidelines Final
Tuesday 2 November 2004 - The Codex Alimentarius Nutrition Committee sitting in a week-long conclave here in Bonn, formerly the capital of Germany, has concluded its deliberations of proposed international Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Supplements. I am sitting in this meeting together with Scott Tips and Paul Taylor of the National Health Federation, one of the only consumer-centered bodies allowed in the meetings, and certainly the only NGO that... [read more]
November 03, 2004 - Sepp HasslbergerCodex and the Titanic's Deck Chairs
Rearranging the Deck Chairs on the Titanic is the title of the report of Scott Tips, correspondent of Whole Foods Magazine and representative of the National Health Federation on this year's meeting in Bonn, Germany where, in the first days of November, the Codex Alimentarius Committee on Nutrition and Special Dietary Foods - CCNFSDU - had its yearly conclave. I have previously reported on this meeting, and have also posted... [read more]
December 04, 2003 - Sepp HasslbergerSouth Africa Opposes Codex Rule on Food Health Information
The international food standard setting body, Codex Alimentarius has been deliberating a giudeline to determine what information food product labels may contain. The draft guideline, which is ready to be adopted at the next meeting of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in Geneva, Switzerland, to be held from 28 June to 3 July 2004, says that no information may be given regarding any food's effects for the prevention, alleviation or cure... [read more]
June 12, 2004 - Sepp Hasslberger
