Codex Alimentarius - Definition Of Food
Codex Alimentarius, in a December 2004 circular letter has asked its members for comments on an upcoming revision of the definition of a food.
Why is this significant for anyone concerned with freedom of choice in health?
An authoritative and internationally agreed definition of food which acknowledges the role of food and nutrition in health could provide a much needed counter-balance to the all-embracing current definitions of a medicine, which are used to justify taking off the market many of the foods/supplements that are most healthy and most effective in doing what medicine SHOULD be doing but isn't - making people better.
Here is the text of the Codex circular for reference. Comments have to be made by national representatives to Codex. If you wish to have some input into the discussion, you will have to find and contact your national Codex Alimentarius Contact Point (you can find each member country's details here) and communicate with the person in charge.
Read here the Codex announcement:
= = = = = = = = =
The 20th Session of the Committee on General Principles, while considering the revision of the Code of Ethics for International Trade in Food, agreed to initiate new work on the revision of the current definition of food, as contained in the Procedural Manual (ALINORM 04/27/33A, paras. 79-84). The 27th Session of the Commission approved this proposal as new work (ALINORM 04/27/41, para. 88 and Appendix VI).The current definition of food is the following:
Food means any substance, whether processed, semi-processed or raw, which is intended for human consumption, and includes drink, chewing gum and any substance which has been used in the manufacture, preparation or treatment of “food” but does not include cosmetics or tobacco or substances used only as drugs.The definition is therefore circulated for comments, proposals for amendments, and consideration by the 22nd Session of the Committee on General Principles, Paris, France, 11-15 April 2005.
Governments and international organizations wishing to submit comments should do so in writing, preferably by email, to the above addresses before 5 March 2005.
(end of Codex announcement)
Codex Alimentarius has been discussing food supplements for years and has recently sent its proposed guidelines to the central "Codex Commission" for final approval and issue. One of the great problems with the Codex and other international guidelines and legislative proposals is that the proponents either know nothing of the healing powers of proper food and of nutritional supplements or worse - they know it's all bull dust because they work for the pharmaceutical industry and clearly, only pharmaceutical medicines can be curative in any way.
There is a great need for education of our lawmakers, and unfortunately the people sitting in national Codex offices - although no one elected them specifically for that job - they are lawmakers of the most effective kind. Their decisions bypass national parliamentary processes because the international guidelines they work out are enforced through trade mechanisms.
Since there is such an international mechanism that bypasses traditional legislative channels, we might as well get used to the thought and provide the input we deem necessary - directly to them.
See related:Codex - The Facts by James Gormley - Citizens for Health
World Net Daily
Vitamins: Will they be regulated as drugs?
Some warn of draconian measure by world body, others roll eyesEU to extend concept of medicine - eliminate "borderline products"
European Directive on Medicinal Herbs Discriminates Against China, India, Other Cultures
The Codex Conundrum and How it Affects Supplements in America
Tim Bolen: Codex Alimentarius:Â Big Pharma's Attempt to Subjugate Planet Earth...
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Friday December 17 2004
updated on Tuesday December 7 2010URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/12/17/codex_alimentarius_definition_of_food.htm
Related ArticlesMeet Codex Alimentarius
Codex Alimentarius - an international body that sets standards for foods - is deliberating uniform world wide rules for vitamin and mineral supplements. The Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses, to some known by its acronym CCNFSDU, will be meeting once again this year. The gathering will take place in Bonn, Germany, and it will try to achieve the needed "consensus" for the vitamin rule to... [read more]
August 30, 2003 - Sepp HasslbergerCodex 2003 - Grossklaus and Mathioudakis: Nutrition not relevant to Health
November 3-7, 2003, the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for special dietary uses met in BONN, Germany, for their once-yearly come-together. On the agenda for discussion were, before baby foods and the description of healthy properties of food on labels, the proposed Codex Giudelines for "Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements". Such guidelines would be, once passed, the equivalent of international law to be followed in all commerce of vitamin... [read more]
November 25, 2003 - Sepp HasslbergerSouth Africa Opposes Codex Rule on Food Health Information
The international food standard setting body, Codex Alimentarius has been deliberating a giudeline to determine what information food product labels may contain. The draft guideline, which is ready to be adopted at the next meeting of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in Geneva, Switzerland, to be held from 28 June to 3 July 2004, says that no information may be given regarding any food's effects for the prevention, alleviation or cure... [read more]
June 12, 2004 - Sepp HasslbergerCodex Nutrition Committee: Supplement Guidelines Final
Tuesday 2 November 2004 - The Codex Alimentarius Nutrition Committee sitting in a week-long conclave here in Bonn, formerly the capital of Germany, has concluded its deliberations of proposed international Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Supplements. I am sitting in this meeting together with Scott Tips and Paul Taylor of the National Health Federation, one of the only consumer-centered bodies allowed in the meetings, and certainly the only NGO that... [read more]
November 03, 2004 - Sepp HasslbergerSupplement Regulation: Who's Behind It, and Why Should You Oppose It?
Health columnist Brian Vaszily just posted an excellent article on the major health site of Dr. Joseph Mercola: "Supplement Regulation: Who's Behind It, and Why Should You Oppose It?" Vaszily explains in easy terms and with clear intention what the real agenda is behind the current drive to "regulate supplements" while often deadly pharmaceutical drugs go scott free. I added some comments - not to criticize but to confirm, from... [read more]
July 19, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger
