Will Nature, Science Allow Aids Discussion?
Darin Brown, initiator of the Aids Wiki is asking a very interesting question: Why is it that scientific media refuse to allow discussion of the different scientific views that exist on the etiology and the best treatment modes of Aids? In the article, titled Who Are the Real AIDS Denialists? – Testing the 'Moore Assertion' Brown cites Prof. John P. Moore, self-appointed "Major General in the War on AIDS" and spokesperson for "The Scientific Community." Moore recently appeared on the Wiki only to refuse any public debate with the words:
"Participating in any public forum with the likes of Bialy would give him a credibility that he does not merit. The science community does not ‘debate’ with the AIDS denialists, it treats them with the utter contempt that they deserve and exposes them for the charlatans that they are. Kindly do not send me any further communications on this or any related matter."
Institute of Science in Society: Unraveling AIDS
Please go to Lew Rockwell's site to read the whole article where, in the end, Brown asks readers to do an experiment: write to the editors of Science and Nature to ask them to relent and allow discussion of the obscure points in the Aids story.
Although Brown jokingly presents the "Brown/Bialy Conjecture", arguing that
"No matter how many emails are received by the editors of Science and Nature in support of the above experiment to test the ‘Moore Assertion,’ they will never allow such an experiment to take place",
I encourage you to do as I did and try wake them up out of their deep slumber. Here is the letter I wrote...- - -
Dear Drs Kennedy and Campbell,with reference to a recent article on the site of Lew Rockwell
Who Are the Real AIDS Denialists? – Testing the 'Moore Assertion'
I would like to encourage your journals to relent on the long-time block on discussing controversal issues around the HIV virus, the tests performed on people to tell them they have "Aids" and the optimal remedies for the condition of acquired immune deficiency.
There is much that has not been said in this debate, and the assertion that "there is nothing to debate" made by Prof. John P. Moore, is highly unscientific. It sounds rather dogmatic and circular in its reasoning, when Moore says
"Participating in any public forum with the likes of Bialy would give him a credibility that he does not merit. The science community does not ‘debate’ with the AIDS denialists, it treats them with the utter contempt that they deserve and exposes them for the charlatans that they are. Kindly do not send me any further communications on this or any related matter."
For now, the debate takes place on internet discussion groups, blogs, a wiki and just "normal" sites with the scientific press refusing to get involved.
I propose that you ignore the question at your own peril. Your magazines will slide futher down the slope towards irrelevance, if discussion of AIDS etiology and mechanisms of the virus or other causes for immune weakness, as well as optimal treatment strategies, including the use of nutritional elements is continually blocked by the attitude shown by Moore and others, and evidently endorsed by your publications.
Please consider bringing that debate into the public and especially into the scientific mind, lest we spend another 25 years without a cure and indeed without a clue as to what is really happening with this "epidemic".
If you would like to see a selection of the views that are held by different people, and of the nutritional approaches that have shown promise in fighting the scourge, just visit my site
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/epidemics.htm
You will find several links to a wide variety of articles. Unfortunately these highly interesting and diverse views have no other forum than the web. You could help in bringing these views to the attention of scientists, sparking a healthy debate.
Kind regards
Sepp Hasslberger
See also:Darin Brown's Aids Wiki (Scroll down the page for stuff on Aids)
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Friday June 23 2006
updated on Wednesday December 8 2010URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/06/23/will_nature_science_allow_aids_discussion.htm
Related Articles'Crystal Meth': Aids Cases Rise in South Africa - Was Duesberg Right?
Under an attention-grabbing headline SOUTH AFRICA: New AIDS threat looms, we are informed that the Western Cape Province's AIDS infection statistics just rose by three percent over earlier figures, saying that a worsening of the AIDS situation in the region is likely. "According to a 2002 national report on HIV prevalence based on a sample of more than 16,000 women attending antenatal clinics in the country's nine provinces, Western Cape... [read more]
June 21, 2006 - Sepp HasslbergerSAM-e: Methylating Agent Stops Depression, HIV
In two recent articles based on research done by Cal Crilly, methylation of the DNA is indicated as a mechanism that controls the expression of what we call "retrovirus" particles. These are parts of the human DNA that are mobile and that often have benign functions in our body processes. See AIDS - Retrovirus Expression Regulated by Methylation? and Why Retroviruses Appear in AIDS, Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases. The retrovirus... [read more]
June 11, 2006 - Sepp HasslbergerWhy Retroviruses Appear in AIDS, Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases
Cal Crilly, who recently wrote AIDS - Retrovirus Expression Regulated by Methylation? published on this site, has now expanded on his research. The new article, which puts many an official researcher to shame, delves into important questions such as "what is a retrovirus" and "why do pregnant women generally test positive for HIV". Fintan Dunne, who has done the editing of the article and published it on his site, says... [read more]
May 30, 2006 - Sepp HasslbergerGlutathione Peroxidase - Selenium, Aminoacids Overcome AIDS
According to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service "new clinical reports from Zambia, Uganda and South Africa indicate that AIDS may be stopped by nutritional supplementation. A number of members of the medical profession have observed that high doses of the trace element selenium, and of the amino acids cysteine, tryptophan, and glutamine can together rapidly reverse the symptoms of AIDS, as predicted by Dr. Harold D. Foster's nutritional hypothesis." Yet,... [read more]
April 26, 2006 - Sepp HasslbergerAre AIDS, CFS Caused By Oxidative Damage?
The officially supported theory of AIDS as an illness caused by a continually mutating retrovirus called HIV has not led to progress in controlling the epidemic in over two decades. We are still looking for a vaccine but chances are it will never be found. We are still treating those reacting positively to a non-virus-specific test with toxic medications, but the results are less than brilliant. The existence of long-term... [read more]
October 11, 2005 - Sepp HasslbergerHIV-Aids: Are Antibodies Good Or Bad?
Jon Rappoport just posted an article that asks an interesting question: In all germ-related illnesses, when you have developed antibodies it means your body has been successful in fighting the disease. You are not going to get sick. Why then is it, that when we talk about HIV and Aids, the presence of antibodies means something completely different? Are the standard rules of medical treatment not valid for Aids? Something... [read more]
August 29, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger
