Guinea Pig Kids - 'Aids Denial' and Human Experiments
Experiments with highly toxic pharmaceutical drugs on orphans in New York - exposed first by Liam Scheff in an article titled The House That AIDS Built - are still, after more than three years, the subject of heated discussion, specially since the BBC aired a documentary titled Guinea Pig Kids.
Children refusing medication were surgically implanted a tube to allow direct injection of drugs into the stomach - Image: Pediatrics.
There are those who say the exposé was really a covert attempt to argue that HIV does not cause AIDS. Not really the truth but then, the media does not bend to truth - it bends to pressure. And pressure there was.
In January this year, a campaign by a group of AIDS activists who push the final solution of toxic chemo drugs for those unfortunate enough to test positive for a stressed protein fraction, bore down on the editorial offices of the BBC. The arguments were hard and heavy - any questioning of the orthodox (HIV=AIDS=DEATH) view was compared to denying the holocaust that hit the Jewish community during the Second World War. The word denialist was invented by the scheming cabal to describe those who have - often legitimate - questions about the association of HIV, AIDS and certain death in an obvious effort to associate them with the rascals of the day - the deniers of the holocaust.
Although the arguments missed the point - the documentary simply told of the plight of Incarnation's human guinea pigs - the BBC fell for the hard talk and caved, asking forgiveness for having aired their documentary on the drug experiments in the Children's home. Aidstruth, the group which set their sights on wiping out any opposition to the current dogma on AIDS, is jubilant.
One of the major figures in the Aidstruth camp is John P. Moore, associated with Weill Medical College of Cornell University in New York City. Moore is quite clear regarding the agenda of his group. He says they want nothing less than destroy - perhaps the equivalent of 'wipe off the map'? - the "denialists" who are causing so many problems to the pharma-drug based AIDS orthodoxy.
Liam Scheff analyzes and responds to John Moore's contradictory statements, giving him some of his own medicine...
- - -
John P.Moore, Aids Denialist
by Liam Scheff
John P. Moore, of the New York Times, and of Aidstruth.org, on his approach to discourse and debate in science [Here ]:
- “AIDS Truth’s approach is to destroy (by public exposure) the “leadership” of the AIDS denialist movement and thereby prevent them from causing the deaths of people who for various reasons are prone to believing the lies the denialists peddle for political reasons, including the profit motive.”
First, there is no “Aids denialist movement.” This is a term Moore has invented to describe those have pointed to the massive, blood-soaked failures of the standard Aids belief system, and pleaded for a new plan of attack on the many problems that “Aids” represents and stands in for.
Second, the profit motive belongs, solely, to the mainstream. Nobody is getting rich by asking GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, or Bristol-Myers-Squibb to stop poisoning poor, Black children with their very profitable, internationally distributed and hawked drugs.
He continues:
- “We know this approach is working, as we win every individual campaign we decide to fight (we don’t always publicize our successes, only when it suits us to do so).”
Moore, the “scientist” we’re supposed to trust, runs hard-core “campaigns” against those who would like to challenge a failing medical paradigm in public debate.
- “The hard core denialists don’t like our strategy, because it’s so effective, and because they are not used to their own tactics being used against them (although, unlike the denialists, we don’t use immoral or illegal activities like cybercrime, threats, libels, etc, etc – the truth speaks for itself, and is sufficient).”
The AidsTruth “strategy” – Writing an endless stream of letters and press-releases to newspapers, to Deans and department heads of universities, to broadcast news agenices, slandering and libeling any and all professors, doctors, scientists, journalists, researchers, patients and private citizens who cite the ten thousand contradictions in the Aids paradigm, and who are asking – begging – for an opening up of the paradigm for reconsideration.
“I think “letting science speak,” is a great notion. On the other hand, Moore (and his cabal at Aidstruth.org), systematically refuse to debate those they attack. They state that they are on the side of “Truth,” and that everyone and anyone who opposes them (or their wishes), for whatever reason or reasons, is on the side of “the denialists.”
Moore says that “Aidstruth” doesn’t libel. But that’s all they do, because they won’t debate. They excuse themselves from their responsibility to face those they indict. They run like the cowards they are. (Ask them to debate anyone of the people they libel; we’ll arrange it the moment they find the cajones).
They don’t libel, but the word “Denialist” constitutes libel. Equating someone who points to the ten thousand published flaws in a dangerous medical paradigm, with someone who denies the Nazi state’s murder of millions in death camps, is a profound, and intentional, libel. Its intention is to terrify anyone and everyone from looking at the statements or research of those they denigrate, for fear of being labeled a “denialist”, too, in newspapers, press releases, and on the web.
They don’t threaten, says Moore, but “Destroying the leadership” constitutes a threat, when it is enacted by letter-writing smear campaigns against academics and researchers at Universities, who lose their jobs or their academic and intellectual freedom to challenge dangerous paradigms and to alert the public to flaws in policy.
Moore states, regarding patients who have been failed by standard “Aids drug” treatments:
- “I have no comment to make on the person/people you refer to, as I don’t know enough about their personal histories, and I don’t offer SPECIFIC medical advice to SPECIFIC individuals in any case as I’m not a physician. In general terms, the best medical centers and physicians would surely be able to help this person/people find a suitable therapeutic regimen.
This is the same John P. Moore who claims that orphaned children should, nay, MUST be used in government/pharmaceutical drug trials, with three, four, five, six, seven drugs – FDA Black-Box labeled drugs (those that have permanently damaged or killed patients taking them) – at once.
That sounds like specific medical “advice” given to a great many specific individuals. But, “in any case,” he says, “I’m not a physician.” (But that’s alright, most physicians aren’t physicians these days, either).
Moore continues, highlighting his frankly, “denialist” position:
- “I am puzzled by your comment regarding HIV+ status and immune deficiency. The science here is unequivocal and long-established: Not every individual who acquires HIV-1 infection develops AIDS, although the overwhelming majority do so over time.”
“Individuals who do develop AIDS progress to that state over a highly variable time course, such that they may well suffer little or no overt immunodeficiency for a prolonged period until they become symptomatic. So, no, HIV+ status is NOT an AUTOMATIC indicator of immune deficiency,
And here is where the record skips. Aids is a name for a thousand kinds of deficiency or excess – wasting or cancer – that occurs in a thousand different environments on earth, for a thousand different reasons. “HIV testing” is a non-specific art, which moves certain groups of people into the Aids drug line.
“Hiv infection,” doesn’t necessarily lead to immune deficiency, says John P. Moore. And so it is.
But that’s not how it goes in the case of the crack-orphans in the Incarnation Children’s Center in Washington Heights. It is not variable, it is not questionable, it is only good for one thing.
Moore and his co-BBC-killer Jeanne Bergman, have decided that all of these children must be “allowed” (forced) to take these “life-saving medications” (that’s FDA Black Box-labeled drugs, to you and me), regardless of their actual health, actual illness, actual response to being on 7 drugs at once, or to any one of the many Aids drug that cause anemia, bone-marrow death, deformity, permanent cellular damage, and then death.
He continues, “So, no, HIV+ status is NOT an AUTOMATIC indicator of immune deficiency,”
- “it’s an indicator that the average HIV+ person will, over time, probably develop immunodeficiency and AIDS,”
Probably. Or maybe not. So, “hiv causes aids?”, I guess, is the slogan.
He concludes, (and here’s where the bread is buttered):
” ... unless he or she takes HAART at the appropriate time.”
HAART is an acronym for the many drugs plied into Aids patients – these of the Black-Box label, the organ failure, skin death, developmental damage, wasting, fat redistribution, and fatal anemia.
So, the “appropriate time” for these drugs is when?
The answer? When John P. Moore and Jeanne Bergman say so. Which is now, immediately, and forever (till death do you part), if you’re an infant in an crack orphanage. And then, we should study what happens when we give the drugs to you, seven at a time, force-fed, , by the helpful doctors who don’t want you to miss a dose.
Moore adds:
- “This is not a remotely controversial issue, at least not in serious scientific and medical circles.”
Well, of course it is. It isn’t just a “remotely controversial issue.” It is an acutely controversial issue, especially in serious medical circles, and it has been for 25 years.
The concept of when, how much, and if to drug “Aids” patients, has been and continues to be battled in the medical literature. Look for “Hit early, hit hard,” as a concept in the early ‘90s, that melted away, like the flesh of so many people who took the drugs in large doses, “early and hard.”
Moore isn’t bright enough, or is too corrupt to allow debate on the subject, even within his own party. (If Moore actually read Aids research, from field physicians and researchers, he’d have to call half of them “denialists” for contradicting his central dogma).
Moore is a true-believer. He refuses to allow a contradictory thought to enter – not his, but Your head. Otherwise, he’d allow debate, and he’d have no fear of public response to the ten thousand failures of his central dogma.
He’s just got to scrub the idea of the scientific process from his mind, (and yours too), and he does so by likening anyone who has a brighter idea, to… are you ready?
A “holocaust denialist.” So, if you know how to treat an “Aids” patient successfully, without murdering them with the treatment, to Moore you are, a “holocaust denialist.”
Not clever, but criminal. Moore, Bergman, and their group, are ruining medicine, ruining scientific discourse and medical discovery, and they must be opposed, and they must be challenged; and competition in the field must be allowed to flourish, so that the best ideas are born out, by process. Not by cabal, or attack, or slander, or censorship. But by competition in the field, which currently takes a “denialist” position to anyone who doesn’t uphold the party line.
Long live competition, and choice; and today especially, may they be born again in science and medicine.
See also:
Thalidomide used on ICC orphans
The Aids Investigation - Liam Scheff
CRITICAL IMPORTANCE OF NATURAL ANTIOXIDANTS IN CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY
More 'Guinea Pig' Kids
An ongoing investigation by the Vera Institute of Justice, has uncovered 59 additional New York City foster care children--between July and September--who may have been used in AIDS drug / vaccine trials in violation of federal regulations. This brings the tentative total number of mostly minority children involved, to 773.Aids Incorporated (2007) by Gary Null
The cost in the war against AIDS has now surpassed the financial investment committed to cardiovascular diseases and diverse cancers. While the science supporting the causes of heart disease and many cancers are relatively conclusive within the medical research community, the etiology of AIDS remains questionable. Simultaneously, a safe cure is no closer in sight today than it was when the disease first burst on the scene three decades ago. Yet the perception of a global AIDS epidemic looms in the minds of the media, medical associations and government leaders.Today there is a rapidly growing body of physicians, medical researchers, virologists, journalists and activists who are starting to voice their opposition to the prevailing scientific paradigm of AIDS and who are calling for a reevaluation of the medical research, epidemiological evidence, diagnostic methodologies and treatments. These voices-now numbering over 5,000, including a couple Nobel Prize laureates-have been virtually shunned by the medical academies and major peer-reviewed publications.
posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Monday October 29 2007
updated on Sunday November 21 2010URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2007/10/29/guinea_pig_kids_aids_denial_and_human_experiments.htm
Related Articles'Guinea Pig Kids' - BBC Video Raises Aids Lobby's Heckles
In the summer of 2004, Liam Scheff, an independent investigative journalist published the story of Incarnation Children's Center in New York, where experimental and highly toxic Aids drugs were forcibly administered to foster children of the State. Originally published in the article The House That Aids Built, the story was subsequently carried by The New York Press with the title: Orphans on Trial. Children refusing medication were surgically implanted a... [read more]
January 26, 2007 - Sepp HasslbergerAfrica - Nevirapine For AIDS Mothers: U.S. Hid Research Concerns
According to a recent article in the Indy Star, the National Institute of Health did not inform presidential aides about safety concerns that emerged during testing of nevirapine in Uganda. As a result, a U.S. led program distributed the drug to hundreds of thousands of pregnant mothers in Africa. The aim was to stem mother-to-child transmission of HIV, a retro-virus widely believed to cause the symptoms of Aids. U.S. Senator... [read more]
December 14, 2004 - Sepp HasslbergerAIDS Experiments on Children in New York's Incarnation Center 'A Human Tragedy'
Liam Scheff is the author of a series of articles exposing the Incarnation Children's Center's cruel experimentation on children - often orphans - who are subjected to excruciating multiple drug "treatments" for having tested positive in so-called HIV/AIDS tests. Liam's original expose' "The House That AIDS Built" is here. Liam Scheff is one of the very few courageous reporters who will not shut up to appease. His latest article: Orphans... [read more]
July 15, 2004 - Sepp HasslbergerAZT, Nevirapine - Children In New York Orphanage Given Toxic Drugs
A Catholic orphanage in New York - Incarnation’s Children Center - has allowed its charges, mostly orphans and children removed from their mothers' care, to be used in cruel experiments with drugs that are known to kill most of the patients taking them. This tragedy has taken place under our very noses - we weren't looking. Journalist Liam Scheff has written about this scandal before and you can see that... [read more]
November 05, 2004 - Sepp HasslbergerAIDS: 'No Gold Standard' For HIV Testing
According to the scientific literature, there is no "gold standard" for HIV tests. Liam Scheff, who has exposed how children are removed from their parents' care and forcibly drugged with highly toxic anti-retrovirals insists that testing for HIV does not mean a thing. A "positive" test result could merely "confirm that you are pregnant or have used drugs or alcohol, or that you’ve been vaccinated; that you have a cold,... [read more]
January 13, 2005 - Sepp HasslbergerAZT For Orphans: The Opportunistic Nature of Drug Testing
Researchers at the Columbia University Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital failed to obtain and evaluate whether they had proper consent, information and safeguards for foster children, said the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Human Research Protections, according to an article by Associated Press writer John Solomon. The investigation followed a scandal that broke when Liam Scheff investigated the New York Incarnation Childrens' Center's use of... [read more]
June 26, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger
