Conversations and Stories
As mentioned in an earlier post, integrity is manifested through the filters and screens that make up the various affiliations in a person's life. Some of these affiliations are stronger, newer, and exercise greater influence than others. Because of these differences, integrity is not necessarily central in a person's affiliation landscape as evidenced in the graphic below. Furthermore, this positioning is not static. As time passes, the filters and screens vary in intensity and significance, and the balance point for integrity shifts.
We humans are social creatures. We have highly evolved language skills and capabilities which we use to communicate with each other through conversation. These conversations convey meaning about us, our situations, our needs, and our aspirations. Essentially, they are our stories.
Stories are structured conversations we have with others about our experiences and the meanings they hold for us. Because of the influence exacted by filters and screens upon us, the stories we tell at one time may be quite different than the stories we tell at another time, place, and circumstance. Stories are contextual. The "truth" they express is relative.
As stated in an earlier post, establishing ground truth is a critical first step for knowledge brokers to ascertain behavior and communication patterns and make relevant responses be they positive or negative. Proclaiming one's ground truth is an exercise of story-telling. Context is crucial if the reality that shapes a person's story and truth can be well-understood and acted upon appropriately.Stories are dependent on the conditions that exist at the time of their telling. The forumwho is in the conversation, where it occurs, when it takes place, and what processes are followedand the agendatopics for conversation, expected outcomes from the conversation, and next steps to be takenare major determinants in how the story is told. Even the same experience shared by many will be related differently depending on the forum and agenda.
Knowledge brokers are concerned about ground truth because of the implications on communication patterns. Repeated over time, stories are reflections of sustained conversation themes and understanding. Changing forums and agendas changes these conversations. Changing conversations leads to experimentation and different experiences. New experiences prompt learning which leads to different stories in an attempt to make meaning out of the new experiences. These new stories influence recurring conversation themes. Told with sufficient frequency over time, stories change the underlying communication patterns and adaptation and evolution occur.
posted by Steve Bosserman on Tuesday September 6 2005
updated on Saturday September 24 2005URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/steve_bosserman/2005/09/06/conversations_and_stories.htm
Related ArticlesGiving It Away, Making Money
The burgeoning "Internet Economy" is redefining operational assumptions and models for all organizations within the public and private sectors. This is particularly evident as free access to information increases and the clash between open source and proprietary development of software intensifies. But the transformation underway does not stop in the realm of bits and bytes; it is spilling into the traditional mainstays of agriculture and all types of industry and... [read more]
February 09, 2008 - Steve BossermanGreenhouses That Change the World
Rick Nelson is the inventor of SolaRoof, a novel approach to greenhouse design and function that integrates a unique covering, heating / cooling system, and infrastructure / framework. It will revolutionize the greenhouse industry. More than that, once the materials are certified for use in human habitation, it will be disruptive to the housing and building industry as well. So what is SolaRoof, anyway, and why does it carry such... [read more]
October 09, 2007 - Steve BossermanAddicted to Oil
On 31 January, President George W. Bush delivered his 2006 State of the Union Message. In it he made a very powerful declaration: Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy. And here we have a serious problem: America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world. The best way to break this addiction is through technology. Since 2001, we have spent nearly $10 billion to... [read more]
December 10, 2006 - Steve Bosserman
